Release date: 3 November 2014
Promoter – Financial Intermediary
MIASTO STOLECZNE WARSZAWALocation
Description
Modernisation of 4,8 km of Voyvodship Road (NR 631) from Naddnieprzanska Street to the borders of the city (phase II)
Objectives
The road is a continuation of the Siekierkowska Route to the city border in the north-east. The section is characterised by high traffic levels and increasing congestion, causing a permanent increase in emissions and road accident risks. The reconstruction of the present road section is central to the overall transport plan for Warsaw as it connects the Siekierkowska Route to Warsaw's city ring road system and the TEN-T network.
Sector(s)
- Transport - Transportation and storage
Proposed EIB finance (Approximate amount)
PLN 191 million (EUR 46 million)
Total cost (Approximate amount)
PLN 382 million (EUR 91 million)
Environmental aspects
The project falls under Annex II of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (2011/92/EU) and was screened-in for environmental impact assessment by the President of the Capital City of Warsaw (Decision 643/OS/2006). A complaint from Zielone Mazowsze was processed after the EIA was submitted. An environmental decision was subsequently issued and confirmed in 2012 (Decision 108/OS/2012). Compliance with the Habitats (92/43/EEC) and Birds Directives (79/409/EEC) will be assessed during appraisal.
Procurement
The Bank will require the promoter to ensure that contracts for the implementation of the project have been/shall be tendered in accordance with the relevant applicable EU procurement legislation (Directives 2004/18/EC and/or 2004/17/EC as well as Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC) as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the EU, with publication of tender notices in the EU Official Journal, as and where appropriate.
Status
Approved - 19/12/2014
Disclaimer
Before financing approval by the Board of Directors, and before loan signature, projects are under appraisal and negotiation. The information and data provided on this page are therefore indicative.
They are provided for transparency purposes only and cannot be considered to represent official EIB policy (see also the Explanatory notes).