Search En menu en ClientConnect
Search
Results
Top 5 search results See all results Advanced search
Top searches
Most visited pages
Reference: SG/E/2023/21
Received Date: 13 September 2023
Subject: Metro de Madrid Line 11 Extension
Complainant: CSO
Allegations: Alleged irregularities in the project concerning environmental and social aspects.
Type: E - Environmental and social impacts of financed projects
Admissibility*
Assessment*
Investigation*
Dispute Resolution*
Consultation*
Closed*
19/09/2023
27/03/2024
Ongoing

* Admissibility date reflects the date the case was officially registered. All other dates pertain to the date in which a stage was completed.

Case Description

The complaint concerns the extension of Metro de Madrid Line 11 between the Plaza Elíptica and Conde de Casal stations. The full project includes the construction of 7 kilometres of underground metro line, building three new stations and refurbishing two existing stations.

The complainants expressed overall support for the development of the metro system in Madrid and stated that the project was very welcome. However, in their view, the project as it is currently being implemented breaches several of the EIB Environmental and Social Standards.

After reviewing the available information and holding discussions with the relevant stakeholders, and based on the complainants’ request, the EIB Group Complaints Mechanism Division undertook to organise an assisted dialogue between the promoter and the complainants.  As the promoter was not in favour of the assisted dialogue process and proceeded to implement the project anyway, the Complaints Mechanism decided to launch a compliance review process. This process will examine whether there is maladministration attributable to the EIB as a result of (i) the project not being in compliance with the EIB’s Environmental and Social Standards 1 (Environmental and Social Impacts and Risks), 2 (Stakeholder Engagement), 3 (Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention), 4 (Biodiversity and Ecosystems), 5 (Climate Change), 7 (Vulnerable Groups, Indigenous Peoples and Gender) and 10 (Cultural Heritage); and (ii) the EIB not having checked whether the project complies with the standards as part of its project due diligence and monitoring.